Skip to contents

Tests whether the estimated intercept and slope jointly fall within a confidence region around specified ideal values (typically intercept=0 and slope=1 for method comparison studies).

Usage

joint_test(object, ...)

# S3 method for class 'simple_eiv'
joint_test(
  object,
  ideal_intercept = 0,
  ideal_slope = 1,
  conf.level = 0.95,
  test_method = c("F", "asymptotic"),
  ...
)

Arguments

object

A simple_eiv object from dem_reg() or pb_reg().

...

Additional arguments (currently unused).

ideal_intercept

The hypothesized intercept value (default: 0).

ideal_slope

The hypothesized slope value (default: 1).

conf.level

Confidence level for the test (default: 0.95).

test_method

Reference distribution for the test. "F" (default) uses the finite-sample F(2, n-2) distribution per Sadler (2010). "asymptotic" uses the chi-squared(2) distribution, which is the large-sample approximation. The two converge for large n.

Value

An object of class htest containing:

statistic

The Mahalanobis distance.

parameter

Degrees of freedom. For the F-based test, df1 and df2; for the asymptotic test, df (always 2).

p.value

The p-value for the test.

conf.int

The confidence level used.

estimate

Named vector of estimated intercept and slope.

null.value

Named vector of hypothesized intercept and slope.

alternative

Description of the alternative hypothesis.

method

Description of the test.

data.name

Name of the input object.

Details

The test computes the Mahalanobis distance between the estimated coefficients and the hypothesized values using the variance-covariance matrix of the estimates. By default, the finite-sample F(2, n-2) reference distribution is used (Sadler, 2010), which is more conservative than the asymptotic chi-squared(2) approximation for small samples.

For Deming regression, the variance-covariance matrix is computed via jackknife. For Passing-Bablok regression, bootstrap resampling must have been performed (i.e., boot_ci = TRUE in the original call).

References

Sadler, W.A. (2010). Joint parameter confidence regions improve the power of parametric regression in method-comparison studies. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 15, 547-554.